Search in the Abstract Database

Search Abstracts 2015

* = Presenting author

P291 Association between Inflammatory Bowel Disease activity and therapeutic drug monitoring of azathioprine and infliximab comparing free and total antidrug antibody measurement

M. Ward*1, 2, B. Warner2, N. Unsworth3, J. Sanderson2, Z. Arkir3, P. Irving2

1Alfred Hospital, Gastroenterology, Melbourne, Australia, 2Guy’s and St. Thomas Hospital, Gastroenterology, London, United Kingdom, 3Guy’s and St. Thomas Hospital, Reference Chemistry, Viapath, London, United Kingdom

Background

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) is useful in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therapeutic cut-offs to predict active disease and the influence of thiopurines on drug levels (DL) according to 6-thioguanine nucleotide (TGN) are not defined. There is limited data on the utility of free anti-drug antibodies (ADAb) against total ADAb. We assessed the utility of TDM of IFX in IBD using a commercially available ELISA and investigated the influence of TGNs on DL and free/total ADAb.

Methods

Prospective evaluation of trough DL and ADAb using Lisa-Tracker,((LT),Theradiag, France) and Immundiagnostik ELISA, ((IM), Germany) in 79 IBD patients (male=40) between January and May 2014. Only free ADAb is detected with LT assay, whereas IM assay measures total ADAb (semiquantitative). Total ADAb Results were calculated using the cut off control. Results of TDM were assessed with respect to faecal calprotectin,(FC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and clinical activity (Harvey Bradshaw Index,(HBI) <5 remission). The relationship between TGN and DL/ADAb was also assessed. LT kits were provided by Theradiag at no cost.

Results

Higher DL were observed amongst patients in remission (HBI;<5 DL 4.7 vs 1.7μg/mL, p=0.01, CRP<5mg/L DL 5 vs 2.5μg/mL,p=0.007, FC<250μg/g DL 5.6 vs 2.9μg/mL, p=0.001, FC<59μg/g DL 5.8 vs 3.3μg/mL, p< 0.001. ROC curve analysis including thresholds to detect active disease are shown in Table 1. ADAb were detected in 3 (4%) patients using LT vs 19 (24%) using IM assay. All patients with ADAb with LT had undetectable DL and had active disease on FC59. Total ADAb with IM assay did not correlate with outcomes. Concomitant immunomodulation use was associated with absence of ADAb using IM assay (p=0.03), however a therapeutic TGN (>245pmol/8 × 108) was not associated with ADAb (p=0.5). TGN quartile analysis did not identify a value associated with DL, (p>0.5), nor was a therapeutic TGN associated with higher DL(p=0.7).

Conclusion

IFX DL were inversely related to disease activity. A cut-off of 3.0-5.7μg/mL was associated with active disease depending on the definition used. The presence offree ADAb was associated with active inflammation, whereas the presence oftotal ADAbwas not. There was no relationship between TGN and DL or ADAb, although most patients were adequately dosed. This study highlights the limitations and utility of TDM in IBD.

 

“Table 1”

ECCOJC jju027 P291 F0001