P076 Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease show IgG immune responses towards disease-associated small intestinal bacteria
Bourgonje, A.R.(1);Roo-Brand, G.(2);Lisotto, P.(2);Sadaghian Sadabad, M.(2);Reitsema, R.D.(3);de Goffau, M.C.(4);Faber, K.N.(1);Dijkstra, G.(1);Harmsen, H.J.M.(2);
(1)University of Groningen- University Medical Center Groningen, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groningen, The Netherlands;(2)University of Groningen- University Medical Center Groningen, Medical Microbiology, Groningen, The Netherlands;(3)University of Groningen- University Medical Center Groningen, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Groningen, The Netherlands;(4)Amsterdam University Medical Center- University of Amsterdam, Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
Background
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by a disturbed gut microbiota composition. Patients with IBD have elevated levels of mucosal and serum levels of IgG-antibodies directed against bacterial antigens, including flagellins. In this study, we aimed to determine to which faecal bacteria the humoral immune response is directed to in patients with IBD.
Methods
Faecal and serum samples were collected from patients with IBD (n=55) and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n=55). Faecal samples were incubated with autologous serum and IgG-coated fractions were isolated by magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) and the coating efficiency was assessed by flow cytometry. Bacterial composition of both untreated and IgG-sorted fecal samples was determined by 16S rRNA-gene Illumina sequencing.
Results
Serum IgG responses were primarily directed to typical small intestinal bacterial genera, including Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Enterococcus, Veillonella and Enterobacteriaceae, as well as against specific Lachnospiraceae bacteria, including Coprococcus and Dorea (all P<0.001) (Figures), and to the species Ruminococcus gnavus (P<0.05). In contrast, serological IgG responses against typical commensal, anaerobic and colonic microbial species were rather low, e.g. to the Lachnospiraceae members Roseburia and Blautia, to Faecalibacterium as well as to Bacteroides. IgG-sorted faecal samples were characterized by significantly lower microbial diversity. Patients with IBD showed more IgG-coating of Streptococcus, Lactobacillus and Lactococcus bacteria compared with healthy controls (all P<0.05). No differences in IgG-coated bacterial fractions were observed between CD and UC, between active or non-active disease, nor between different disease locations in CD.
Conclusion
The IgG immune response is specifically targeted at typical small intestinal bacterial genera, whereas responses against commensal, rather colonic-type microbiota are lower in patients with IBD. These findings may be indicative of a strong immunological exposure to small intestinal bacteria in concordance with relative immune tolerance against commensal bacteria.