P778 Longitudinal trajectory of fatigue in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a prospective study

N. Borren1, M. Long2, J. van der Woude3, R. Sandler2, A. Ananthakrishnan1

1Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Gastroenterology, Boston, USA, 2University of North Carolina, Gastroenterology, Chapel Hill, USA, 3Erasmus University Medical Center, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Background

Fatigue is a commonly reported and sometimes disabling symptom in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Its prevalence, mechanism, and impact remain poorly understood. Using a large cohort of patients with IBD, we aimed to prospectively determine the trajectory of fatigue and to identify determinants and impact of incident and prevalent fatigue on patients with IBD.

Methods

This prospective study was nested within the IBD partners cohort, a validated internet-based cohort of patients with IBD. Participants were invited to prospectively complete questionnaires assessing fatigue status at baseline and subsequently after 6 and 12 months. Fatigue was assessed using the validated Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) score. A FACIT-F score of < 43 was defined as significant fatigue. We examined the trajectory and predictors of different courses of fatigue including incident fatigue (not fatigued as baseline but fatigued at 6 months) and resolved fatigue (fatigue at baseline but resolved on follow-up).

Results

A total of 2429 patients (1605 CD, 824 UC) completed baseline assessment among whom 1057 completed a second assessment at 6 months. First, we identified three distinct patterns of fatigue. Episodic fatigue defined as fatigue at any one (but not both) time point was the most common, affecting 1182 patients (57.0%). Persistent fatigue (at both baseline and follow-up) affected 33.5% (n = 695) while only 196 patients (9.5%) reported no fatigue at any time point (n = 196) (Figure). Patients that reported persistent or intermittent fatigue were more likely to have active disease (p < 0.001), be younger, (p < 0.001), report anaemia (p = 0.002) and low vitamin B12 levels (p < 0.001) and to have a prior diagnosis of depression, anxiety or sleep disorder (p < 0.001). Among patients who were not fatigued at baseline, 26% developed new fatigue at 6 months defined as incident fatigue). The strongest predictor of this being presence of sleep disturbance at baseline (OR 2.45, 95% CI 0.24–1.55) (Table). In contrast, only 12.3% of those with fatigue at baseline had symptom resolution by month 6. Resolution of fatigue was more common in those with UC (p = 0.03), quiescent disease at baseline (p = 0.006), not receiving biologic therapy at baseline (p = 0.016) and no sleep disturbance (p < 0.001), anxiety (p = 0.002) and depressive (p = 0.005) symptoms at baseline.

Figure. Patterns of fatigue in IBD.

Table. Determinants of incident and resolved fatigue among those with IBD.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate three distinct trajectories of fatigue in patients with IBD with their distinct predictors. Importantly, 26% of patients developed new onset fatigue at 6 months demonstrating the substantial impact of this on patients with IBD.